By understanding how IC manufacturer codes are structured and interpreted, you can maintain consistency and reliability across design, production, and supply chains. This article will discuss the importance of IC manufacturer codes, how to read them, their role in ensuring quality, and effective techniques for verifying genuine components.

Integrated Circuit (IC) manufacturer codes are unique identifiers printed on chips to indicate their origin and production details. These alphanumeric markings differ among companies, but all serve the same purpose - to ensure clear traceability and authenticity.
Beyond identifying the maker, IC codes can reveal material composition, component category, or manufacturing batch. Some global manufacturers adopt multiple coding systems to comply with international standards, ensuring compatibility and recognition across regions.
Three major organizations define the standards used worldwide:
• EECA (Europe) – European Electronic Component Manufacturers Association
• JIS-C-7012 (Japan) – Japanese Industrial Standard
• JEDEC (North America) – Joint Electron Device Engineering Council
Each IC code follows a structured format that conveys specific technical and manufacturing information. Under the JEDEC standard, codes consist of hexadecimal fields - sometimes up to 13 - that describe the device type, manufacturer registration, and product version.
By learning how to interpret these characters, you can identify compatibility, performance class, and potential design constraints. Most companies include a manufacturer prefix and a product serial number, both searchable in public JEDEC or corporate databases.
Using these systems helps you verify authenticity, maintain accurate documentation, and streamline sourcing, ensuring projects proceed without costly part mismatches.
IC manufacturer codes play a role in maintaining accuracy and reliability throughout the electronics industry. They enable quick verification of a component’s source, production date, and quality level.
In manufacturing and service operations, traceable codes simplify recalls or defect tracking. They also help design engineers confirm that substitute parts meet identical specifications, preventing performance errors or safety risks.
Understanding and applying these codes ensures consistency, compliance with industry standards, and long-term product dependability.
Identifying the maker of an IC begins with reading its prefix, the abbreviation printed on the chip. This prefix links to a registered company — for instance, SN or TL typically represents Texas Instruments, LM may belong to National Semiconductor or TI, and MC points to Motorola or ON Semiconductor.
An IC marking usually includes:
• Prefix: Manufacturer or product family
• Middle section: Device number or circuit type
• Suffix: Package, tolerance, or temperature rating
Example: LM358N — “LM” for National Semiconductor, “358” for a dual operational amplifier, and “N” for a PDIP package. Understanding this structure ensures accurate part matching and prevents compatibility issues.
Even with global standards, decoding IC markings can be challenging due to several factors:
• Shared prefixes: Multiple brands may use similar identifiers, leading to confusion.
• Faded or laser-etched markings: Age or handling can make codes difficult to read.
• Counterfeit relabeling: Fake or re-marked chips can imitate genuine parts.
• Regional variations: The same product may carry different codes across markets.
• Defunct manufacturers: Mergers and acquisitions often alter legacy code references.
To prevent counterfeit or defective parts from entering production, engineers should follow these best practices:
• Buy from authorized sources: Only purchase from certified distributors or directly from the manufacturer.
• Check printed codes: Compare the markings against official datasheets and code listings.
• Inspect physical details: Verify color, texture, and logo alignment - inconsistencies suggest tampering.
• Use traceable identifiers: Many components now include QR or batch codes linked to official databases.
• Request Certificates of Conformance (CoC): These documents confirm that the parts meet required safety and quality standards.
| Abbreviation | Manufacturer | Abbreviation | Manufacturer |
| AM | Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) | A | National Semiconductor |
| AMSREF | Advanced Monolithic Systems | ADC | National Semiconductor |
| OM | AEG | CLC | National Semiconductor |
| PCD | AEG | COP | National Semiconductor |
| PCF | AEG | DAC | National Semiconductor |
| SAA | AEG | DM | National Semiconductor |
| SAB | AEG | DP | National Semiconductor |
| SAF | AEG | DS | National Semiconductor |
| SCB | AEG | F | National Semiconductor |
| SCN | AEG | L | National Semiconductor |
| TAA | AEG | LF | National Semiconductor |
| TBA | AEG | LFT | National Semiconductor |
| TCA | AEG | LH | National Semiconductor |
| TEA | AEG | LM | National Semiconductor |
| A | Allegro Microsystems | LMC | National Semiconductor |
| STR | Allegro Microsystems | LMD | National Semiconductor |
| UCN | Allegro Microsystems | LMF | National Semiconductor |
| UDN | Allegro Microsystems | LMX | National Semiconductor |
| UDS | Allegro Microsystems | LPC | National Semiconductor |
| UGN | Allegro Microsystems | MF | National Semiconductor |
| EP | Altera | MM | National Semiconductor |
| EPM | Altera | NH | National Semiconductor |
| PL | Altera | UNX | National Semiconductor |
| A | AMD | PB | NEC |
| Am | AMD | PC | NEC |
| AMPAL | AMD | PD | NEC |
| PAL | AMD | UPD | NEC |
| OM | Amperex | UPD8 | NEC |
| PCD | Amperex | NJM | New Japan Radio Corp. |
| PCF | Amperex | NSC | Newport |
| SAA | Amperex | SM | Nippon Precision Circuits |
| SAB | Amperex | NC | Nitron |
| SAF | Amperex | MM | Oki |
| SCB | Amperex | MSM | Oki |
| SCN | Amperex | MC | ON Semiconductor |
| TAA | Amperex | EF | ON Semiconductor (previously Thomson) |
| TBA | Amperex | ET | ON Semiconductor (previously Thomson) |
| TCA | Amperex | GSD | ON Semiconductor (previously Thomson) |
| TEA | Amperex | HCF | ON Semiconductor (previously Thomson) |
| V | Amtel | L | ON Semiconductor (previously Thomson) |
| AD | Analog Devices | LM | ON Semiconductor (previously Thomson) |
| ADEL | Analog Devices | LS | ON Semiconductor (previously Thomson) |
| ADG | Analog Devices | M | ON Semiconductor (previously Thomson) |
| ADLH | Analog Devices | MC | ON Semiconductor (previously Thomson) |
| ADM | Analog Devices | NE | Philips |
| ADP | Analog Devices | LM | Texas Instruments |
| CA | RCA | SN | Texas Instruments |
| CD | RCA | TL | Texas Instruments |
| HEP | RCA | UA | Fairchild Semiconductor |
| LM | National Semiconductor / TI | LF | Texas Instruments |
| MC | Motorola (ON Semiconductor) | LMV | Texas Instruments |
| NE | Philips | UC | Unitrode |
| NTE | NTE Electronics | LT | Linear Technology |
| MAX | Maxim Integrated | LTC | Linear Technology |
| ADI | Analog Devices | ST | STMicroelectronics |
| SG | Silicon General | STR | Sanken |
| TDA | Philips / STMicroelectronics | STRM | Sanken |
| TL | Texas Instruments | KA | Samsung |
| LMH | Texas Instruments | LA | Sanyo |
| MC | Motorola / ON Semiconductor | TA | Toshiba |
| NJU | New Japan Radio (JRC) | TC | Toshiba |
| HA | Hitachi | AN | Panasonic |
| HD | Hitachi | MN | Panasonic |
| BA | Rohm Semiconductor | BA | Rohm Semiconductor |
| BD | Rohm Semiconductor | CXA | Sony |
| CXA | Sony | CXD | Sony |
| CXD | Sony | IR | International Rectifier |
| IRF | International Rectifier | IX | IXYS Semiconductor |
| FDS | Fairchild Semiconductor | MMBT | Diodes Inc. |
| LMK | Texas Instruments | XC | Xilinx |
| XC | Xilinx | DS | Dallas Semiconductor |
| DS | Dallas Semiconductor | ISL | Intersil |
| ISL | Intersil | HN | Hitachi |
| KIA | KEC | SM | Silicon Motion |
| SI | Siliconix (Vishay) | VN | STMicroelectronics |
| TLV | Texas Instruments | MAX | Maxim Integrated |
| UC | Unitrode (now TI) | NJM | New Japan Radio Corp. |
| MCP | Microchip Technology | PIC | Microchip Technology |
| AT | Atmel (now Microchip) | SST | Silicon Storage Tech. |
| XC | Xilinx | EP | Altera |
| EPF | Altera | EPM | Altera |
Accurate decoding of IC manufacturer codes is essential to quality control in modern electronics manufacturing. Automated barcode scanners and optical recognition systems compare real-time readings with verified databases to detect inconsistencies before assembly.
Manual inspection also plays a key role in verifying markings during incoming quality checks. This traceability ensures compliance with ISO and JEDEC quality standards, allowing manufacturers to isolate and address defects rapidly.
Precise code reading safeguards performance, strengthens brand trust, and upholds the long-term reliability of every electronic system.
Integrated Circuit manufacturer codes are the backbone of traceability, authenticity, and quality assurance in the electronics industry. From global standards like JEDEC and JIS to company-specific prefixes and serials, each code tells a story about the chip’s origin, purpose, and compliance level. When you can understand how to interpret and verify these codes, you can gain control over sourcing, reduce the risk of counterfeits, and ensure that every electronic product performs as intended. Maintaining accurate code reading also supports ISO and JEDEC quality systems, reinforcing trust between manufacturers and end users.